Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Redwine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1945No. 29427Published

1DissentSimpson, J.

(dissenting) — In addition to concurring in the result sought by Judge Millard in his dissenting opinion, I desire to submit an additional dissent to the majority opinion.

One under arrest or in custody, charged with crime, is under no duty to make statements concerning such crime; and statements tending to implicate him, made in his presence, although not denied by him, are not admissible against him. This rule has been adhered to by the Federal and state courts in this country. Below I list many of them. State v. McKenzie, 184 Wash. 32, 49 P. (2d) 1115; Commonwealth v. McDermott, 123 Mass.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. . MarendiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. People v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. GangiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API