Legal Opinion
State v. Santillanes
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 2, 1970No. 361PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Defendants, Danny Santillanes and Richard Tony Farmer, were jointly tried to a jury and convicted of violating § 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.19S3 (robbery). Each of the defendants has separately appealed from the judgment; with but one exception to be noted, they present like questions for determination here. Both defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions to dismiss and for directed verdicts. They further contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions for mistrial based upon claimed prejudicial remarks of the prosecutor. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ParisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. McGuintyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. OrzenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.