Commonwealth v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARROW, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal by the Commonwealth from an order suppressing evidence of cocaine found on the defendant when law enforcement officers searched him. We conclude that we may not entertain this appeal because the trial court’s suppression order is not one which the Commonwealth is permitted to appeal. Code § 19.2-398; Commonwealth v. Ragland, 7 Va. App. 452, 453, 374 S.E.2d 183, 183 (1988).
Generally, the Commonwealth may not appeal “a case involving the life or liberty of a person.” Va. Const, art. VI, § 1. See also Commonwealth v. Smith, 230 Va. 354, 357, 337…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Commonwealth v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- Troncoso v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- West v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Ian Christian Carlson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- State v. ShadeNevada Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.