Legal Opinion
State v. Shade
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1994No. 24986PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a discretionary appeal, pursuant to NRS 177.015(2), from a pretrial order of the district court granting respondent’s motion in limine to exclude evidence. This is also an appeal, pursuant to NRS 177.015(1)(b), from an order of the district court granting a motion to dismiss. Both appeals have been docketed in this court under a single case number.
The state charged respondent Marshall Timothy Shade with several drug related offenses after Reno police officers allegedly observed Shade in the company of his stepson Peter Kenneson and confidential informant Ray Richardson.…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Cook v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- KIKKOS v. TsalikisNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. StrizichMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Salaiscooper v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ShadeNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.