Legal Opinion · Dissent
Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 8, 1988No. 1210Published
1DissentCureton, Judge
I would uphold .the trial court’s ruling that Regulation 19-445.2120 of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board (Board) does not comply with Section 11-35-1590, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976 as amended, and the lease awarded by South Carolina Educational Television (ETV) to *461Tall Tower, Inc., (Tall Tower) is void as not having been approved and awarded in conformance with statutory law.
The issues of merit presented to the trial judge and this court are whether (1) Charleston Television exhausted the administrative procedures provided by Section 1-23-126, (2) Regulation 19-445.2120…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frady v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- South Carolina Wildlife Federation v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1978
- Society of Professional Journalists v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Community Action Research Group v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Banks v. Batesburg Hauling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.