Legal Opinion

People v. Austin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1994No. B069535PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Defendants were convicted of possession of a controlled substance for sale (cocaine), robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. In addition, defendant Wagner was convicted of conspiracy to possess a controlled substance for sale. We conclude Wagner’s conviction for conspiracy to possess a controlled substance for sale must be reversed due to insufficient evidence and the sentences of both defendants on the robbery convictions must be stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654. In all other respects, the judgments are affirmed.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Deputy Sheriff Jose…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API