Legal Opinion

Mark v. Bradford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1946No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 43,252PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

By their bill of complaint plaintiffs sought to have a cloud removed from their title to a parcel of land containing approximately 160 acres in Rose Lake township, Osceola comity. After hearing pn the merits decree was entered granting the above relief. Defendants have appealed.

William Howe, now deceased, was the father of plaintiff, Mrs. Pearl Mark. On April 22, 1942, he, a widower,- was the owner of the parcel of land involved in this suit. At that time he was the sole occupant of the premises, at least so far as appears from the record no other member of the family resided with him; and on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Tennant v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Arrington v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Eaton v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wronski v. Sun Oil CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Corbett v. La BereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. MuzeckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Terry v. Conway Land, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Peppertree Farms, L.L.C. v. ThonenOhio Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API