Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Russo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 10, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Any terms of an automobile liability policy which violate section 109 of the Insurance Law or limit the free force and effect thereof are illegal. Nevertheless the policy will be held valid and deemed to include the provisions required by that section. (Bakker v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 264 N. Y. 150.) This rule controls the rights, duties and obligations of the insurer and the policyholder. We construe the present contract as attempting to limit the statutory provisions. It is, therefore, illegal and may not be enforced.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bersani v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Posner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bersani v. GEN. ACC. FIRE CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Passaro v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Admiral Insurance v. Grace Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API