Schramer v. Tiger Athletic Ass'n of Aurora
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
Plaintiff, Carol A. Schramer, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Kane County dismissing her complaint against defendant, Tiger Athletic Association of Aurora, for recovery of her husband’s hospital, medical, and funeral expenses pursuant to section 6 — 21 of the Liquor Control Act of 1934 (235 ILCS 5/6 — 21 (West 2000)), popularly known as the Dramshop Act. At issue is whether the Dram-shop Act provides for recovery of these expenses where the decedent perished as a result of his own intoxication. We conclude that it does, and we therefore reverse.
In her complaint, plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wakulich v. MrazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Hall v. HennIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Becker v. ZellnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Illinois Housing Development Authority v. Sjostrom & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Williams v. StaplesIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kovak v. BarronAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Turner v. 1212 S. Michigan PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- World Painting Company v. CostiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Crull v. SriratanaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- O'Casek v. Childrens Home and Aid Society of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.