Legal Opinion

Hall v. Henn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 95431PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

In this case, we are asked to construe the scope of the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act (745 ILCS 65/1 et seq. (West 2002)). Specifically, we are asked to decide whether the Act’s limitation of liability applies only to landowners who open their property for recreational use by the general public, or whether it also applies to landowners who open their property for recreational use by invited guests only.

BACKGROUND

During the winter of 2000-01, defendants, Tim and Sue Henn, built and maintained a sled run in their backyard. The run included steps, a platform, and a luge-like…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Davis v. Toshiba MacHine Co., AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Cincinnati InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kajima Construction Services, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Village of Chatham v. County of SangamonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API