Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Nicolaisen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1896No. Sac. No. 56PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Placer County; J. E. Prewett, Judge. Action by Richard T. Sutton against Christian Nicolaisen and others. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for trespasses committed by defendants by entering on his land, and tearing down about thirty feet of his boundary line fence, and digging up the soil, and destroying the grass and vegetation growing thereon, and also to obtain an *349injunction restraining defendants from repeating the said trespasses, and from constructing, as they threatened to do, an open road through and across plaintiff’s said land. The defendants, by their answer, denied that they had committed, or threatened to commit, any trespasses upon the land of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huffman v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cooper v. Monterey CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gloster v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kirk v. SchultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ball v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API