Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Ethicon, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2007No. 33224PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Chief Justice.

The Appellants, plaintiffs in the action below, who received medical treatment involving the implantation of contaminated sutures as patients at two hospitals named as defendants below, appeal the dismissal of their action against the defendant hospitals for failure to provide pre-suit notices and certificates of merit as required by the Medical Professional Liability Act. See W. Va. Code § 55-7B-6(b) (2001) (Supp.2002).1 The plaintiffs argue that, because they have not asserted medical malpractice claims, they are not bound to comply with the pre-suit requirements of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ewing v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hinchman v. GilletteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Boggs v. Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Gray v. MenaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Manor Care Inc. v. Tom DouglasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. R.K. v. St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Westmoreland v. VaidyaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cline v. Kresa-ReahlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Joyce E. Minnich v. MedExpress Urgent Care, Inc. - West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API