Nicolai-Neppach Co. v. Abrams
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, «T.
The appealing defendant, Ben Abrams, whom we will call the defendant, assigns error of the court in permitting plaintiff to file its amended reply at the time of the trial. This was in the sound discretion of the trial court and from an examination of the record there was no abuse in the exercise of such discretion. The point is not well taken.
At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the defendant moved for a nonsuit and assigns error in the denial thereof. This raised the main question in the case. As a general rule one partner has no authority to bind the partnership of his copartner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haswell v. StandringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- First National Bank v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Hollister Bros. v. Bluthenthal & BickartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Cassidy and McFadden v. Saline Co. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Union Nat. Bank v. NeiliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barbour v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- First Interstate Bank v. BergendahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Barbour v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Meyer v. MittalDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023