Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Mittal
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 17, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00621Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASON MEYER, an individual; No. 3:21-cv-00621-HZ ARGIL DX LLC f/k/a ZAP TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC, a OPINION & ORDER Nevada limited liability company; and ARGIL DX, putative partnership, Plaintiffs, v. ANKUR MITTAL, an individual; AXENO CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ARGILDX CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ACCUNITY SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., an Indian private company; and ADX CONSULTING INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants. Heather Harriman Eric Lang Rose Law Firm, P.C. 5200 SW Meadows Rd, Ste 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Attorneys for Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.