Legal Opinion
Howell v. Howell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 10, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Cannataro, J.), dated April 4, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition and vacated a temporary order of protection against the respondent.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the hearing court” (Matter of Creighton v Whitmore, 71 AD3d 1141, 1141 [2010]; see Family Ct Act §§ 812, 832; Matter of Clarke-Golding v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Creighton v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kaur v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Halper v. HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Clarke-Golding v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Robinson v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tulshi v. TulshiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Tulshi v. TulshiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014