Anthony Eidem v. Vang, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTHONY EIDEM, No. 1:23-cv-01198-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S 12 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE 13 VANG, et al., GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 91) 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS 16 17 Plaintiff Anthony J. Eidem is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). This case proceeds on 19 the second amended…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.