Legal Opinion
Stossel v. Fleyshmahker
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 7, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gabriel M. Krausman, J.
Plaintiff initiated this action to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile accident. Defendant conceded liability and a nonjury trial was held to determine if plaintiff came within the 90 out of the first 180-day provision of subdivision 4 of section 671 of the New York Insurance Law. If the no-fault threshold was met, reasonable compensation for the injury was to be determined.
This is a factually uncomplicated case. On July 3, 1981, plaintiff, Katy Stossel, was struck on her foot by defendant’s vehicle. She was taken to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hezekiah v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Covey v. SimontonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Hodder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- DiPirro v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Elizabeth D'Avolio and Dominic D'Avolio v. Dictaphone Corporation, Paul J. Lopez, and Nicoletta N. Darmas, Dictaphone Corporation and Paul J. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.