Legal Opinion

State v. Orosco

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1977No. 41375PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of operating or being in the actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor in violation of the provisions of section 39-669.07, R. R. S. 1943, and of refusing to submit to a chemical test of his blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his body fluid in violation of the provisions of section 39-669.08 (4), R. R. S. 1943. The conviction under section 39-669.07, R. R. S. 1943, was in the information charged to be a third such offense and following the jury verdict the court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LouthanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. GerberNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. People v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API