Treusch v. Ottenburg
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Western District of Michigan.
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Circuit Judge.
The defendants in error, as partners under the firm name and style of S. Ottenburg & Bros., having brought suit in the circuit court on several claims and demands contracted in the spring and summer of 1891 by Jacob Lustig for goods and merchandise sold him, and, having obtained judgment thereon against said Lustig for the sum of $7,623.90, together with the costs of suit, thereafter applied for and caused to be issued a writ of garnishment against the plaintiffs in error, citizens of Michigan, and residents of Grand Rapios, in said state, for the purpose of reaching…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Jones v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hill v. BowmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Heineman v. SchlossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gumberg v. TreuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Childs v. N. B. Carlstein Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1896
- Wilson v. PerrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894