Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Heaton v. Second Injury Fund

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 3, 1988No. 870336-CAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BENCH, Judge:

(concurring and dissenting).

I concur in the main opinion’s conclusion that the 1979 finding of permanent total disability was only tentative. Under the clear wording of the statute, the finding can be final only after referral to the rehabilitation division. I also concur in the award of interest on disability benefits owed.

I dissent from the holding that the Industrial Commission has the discretion to order benefits payable as of the date permanent total disability is medically confirmed. The main opinion concludes there is no statutory language that explicitly states when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mecham v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Oman v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API