Legal Opinion

Mecham v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1984No. 19337PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiff Eudora Mecham seeks review of an order of the Industrial Commission that adopted the conclusion of the administrative law judge that her claim for permanent total disability was barred by U.C.A., 1953, § 35-1-99.

n On October 31, 1961, Mecham sustained a disc hernia as a result of an industrial accident while employed by defendant Eitel McCullough, Inc. However, the diagnosis upon initial examination was simply acute lumbo-sacral strain. The employer sent a “First Report of Injury” to the Industrial Commission six days after the date of the accident. Mecham’s physician…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Utah State Insurance Fund v. DutsonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Buxton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Burgess v. Siaperas Sand & GravelCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. Kennecott Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Spencer v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATE OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Mannes-Vale, Inc. v. ValeUtah Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API