Du Pont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The two petitioners wished to reduce their income taxes. This desire is shared by many of their fellow citizens, rich or poor, and therefore is so far, so good. The Government contends, however, that too far is- not so good and says that here the taxpayers employed a device that did go too far, in the legal sense at any rate. They went down a road which has not been marked by any very satisfactory judicial “dangerous curve ahead” signs. The relation (or lack of it) between ethics and tax avoidance (evasion) has puzzled judges and others who have considered the subject.
The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Laureys v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- McClure v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Perrett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- United States v. H. F. Keeler and Alice H. Keeler, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- McNeill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.