Davidson v. Sechrist
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Dioldnson District Court. At the May Term, 1881, of the district court, defendants Seohrist and another had judgment against plaintiff Davidson, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action of replevin, brought by W. T. Davidson to recover certain goods and chattels *325claimed by him, but which had been taken in execution by the defendants, Sechrist and Mahan. The sole question involved in the case is, whether such goods and chattels were exempt from the execution levied upon them. The case was. tried before the court below without a jury, and the court made the following findings of fact and law.
“findings op pact.
“The court doth find —
“ 1. That W. T. Davidson, the said plaintiff, is a bona fide resident of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- In re Estate of McManusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Betz v. MaierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Gano v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Federal Agency Investment Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Wilhite v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.