Legal Opinion

Ochsner v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 17, 1908PublishedCited by 32 opinions

CASE 73. — PROSECUTION AGAINST JOHN OCHSNER FOB ROBBERY. — Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court. "W. MeD. Shaw, Circuit Judge. Defendant convicted and appeals —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice O’Rear

Affirming.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of rohhery. His punishment was fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for the term of 10 years. On his appeal he relies on three principal alleged errors: One because the court permitted the Commonwealth to require the appellant, while on the witness stand, to testify in detail as to the facts of a former conviction of a felony over the objection of the defendant'; the other because the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that they should only consider the fact of his former conviction as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Powers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Branson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. Buckles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  5. Heilman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Music v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Johnston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Day v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Hayes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API