Legal Opinion

KBC Asset Management. N.V. v. McNamara

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 1, 2014No. MDL No. 2520Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in a Southern District of Ohio action (North) moves to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio. This litigation currently consists of two actions pending in two districts. The actions are shareholder derivative actions brought against current and former officers and directors of Chemed Corp., a health care and plumbing services provider.1 Plaintiffs in both actions allege that Chemed’s subsidiary, Vitas Healthcare Corp. (Vitas), systematically submitted improper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Best Buy Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  3. In re Gerber Probiotic Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  4. In re Michaels Stores, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  5. In Re Royal American Industries, Inc. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API