Legal Opinion

CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO. v. McCree & Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1950No. Civ. A. 3093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff railroad to recover demurrage charges incurred by defendant during the period from July 1, 1948 to November 6, 1948. The matter has been submitted upon a stipulation of facts.

During the period above mentioned plaintiff transported cement, sand and gravel' which was consigned to defendant at Baroda, Minnesota. The cement was shipped in interstate commerce; the sand and gravel in intrastate commerce. The cars used in the intrastate shipments were, and are, used by plaintiff indiscriminately in interstate and intrastate commerce.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kittanning Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Iversen v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  4. Palmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. Nebraska Public Service Commission v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Armour & Co. v. Louisiana Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Department of Public ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Armour & Co. v. Louisiana Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API