Legal Opinion

Breitenberger v. Schmidt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 20, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In error to the Circuit Court of Adams County; the Hon. William Marsh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, P. J.

This was an action of trespass on the case, commenced by plaintiff in error on April 30, 1884. The declaration sets forth at great length that plaintiff, being a skilled mechanic and machinist, induced by an advertisement of the defendants, or some of them, for such a person to take charge and direction of their machine shop and iron foundry at Quincy, Illinois, came to see them and was induced to enter into a copartnership with defendants Schmidt and Pfau Sr., on the first day of April, 1875, for the purpose of carrying on a general foundry and machine business, by the terms of which said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Chicago & Tomah RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People ex rel. Greenwood v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leslie George Wakat v. Peter F. Harlib, Irwin Haviland, Harold T. Thompsen, Thomas J. Murphy and Thomas v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  2. Porter v. MackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Mauvis-Jarvis v. WongAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. Merker v. Belleville Distillery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API