Legal Opinion

State v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1988No. 886SC168PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction of any of the offenses submitted to the jury. Those offenses were: second degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, felony death by vehicle and misdemeanor death by vehicle.

Murder in the second degree is the lawful killing of a human being with malice but without premeditation and deliberation. State v. Robbins, 309 N.C. 771, 775, 309 S.E. 2d 188, 190 (1983). While an intent to kill is not a necessary element of murder in the second degree, that crime does not exist in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. LangSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. CanadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. MullicanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API