Kost v. Lancaster
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is a suit by a licensed agent for a real estate broker’s commission. After a trial to a jury a judgment was entered for the defendant.
The most interesting question for decision in this case is whether the unconditional promise to pay a commission to the agent contained in the contract for sale can be enforced by the agent where the sale is not completed.
Appellant was employed by appellee to negotiate the sale of certain real estate. No written contract was executed listing the property with appellant. However, as a result of his efforts appellee entered into a contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stevens v. KarrTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Keener v. ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Francis v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Flagg Realtors, Inc. v. HarvelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Sale v. Contran CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ambox, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc. v. Morgan Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Davidson v. SuberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.