Legal Opinion

Sale v. Contran Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 28, 1972No. 17925PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Justice.

Jim Sale, a securities broker, sued Con-tran Corporation for a fee of $130,000 on an acquisition of stock which was never completed. The trial court rendered summary judgment denying recovery, and the broker appeals. We affirm on the ground that the broker’s contract made the fee contingent on a “purchase,” which never occurred.

The contract is evidenced by a letter dated April 16, 1969, from plaintiff Jim Sale to Harold Simmons, president of defendant Contran Corporation, as follows:

“Please call me and let me know when you will be able to go with me to Lafayette, Louisiana…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ervay, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. West Realty & Investment Co. v. HiteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Amory Manufacturing Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. O'Shea v. Coronado Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Praeger v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Community Development Service, Inc. v. Replacement Parts Manufacturing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Phillips v. Inexco Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API