Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Delaware River and Bay Authority
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 11, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-379PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge:
The plaintiff in this age discrimination action is Ray Marshall, the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor. The defendant is the Delaware River & Bay Authority (“the Authority”), an interstate agency created by a compact between the states of Delaware and New Jersey. The complaint alleges that the defendant has been discriminating against its employees and against applicants for employment on the basis of age since the end of 1974, in violation of Section 4(a)(1) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1), and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ramirez v. Puerto Rico Fire ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Sikora v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- 32 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1239, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,783 Jose E. Muniz Ramirez v. Puerto Rico Fire Service and Office of Personnel and Its DirectorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- George S. SMART, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORTER PAINT CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.