State v. Graham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant contends the court erred in denying him court-appointed counsel or additional time in which to secure retained counsel. We find State v. McCrowre, 312 N.C. 478, 322 S.E. 2d 775 (1984), controlling. Pursuant thereto, we hold that in the absence of (1) further inquiry into the reason(s) for defendant’s lack of counsel and (2) the inquiries required by N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 15A-1242 (1983), it was error to require defendant to proceed to trial pro se.
The pertinent facts are as follows:
Defendant initially requested and received court-appointed counsel. On 1 June 1983, by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. McCrowreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ColbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.