Legal Opinion

Continental Life Insurance v. Houser

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9617PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The third paragraph of the appellee’s complaint is, substantially, the ordinary count for money had and received, and, although badly drawn and lacking in certainty, is sufficient on demurrer. The remedy for a pleading defective in point of certainty is a motion to make more definite and 'certain.

The fourth paragraph alleges that, on the” 23d day of December, 1872, one William Hesse received from appellant a policy of insurance on the life of his mother, Louise Hesse, payable to himself; that the premium was $155 per annum, payable in four instalments; that on the 4th of July, 1873, William…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Day v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. FerrenbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Van Werden v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Continental Life Insurance v. HouserIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. McCormickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API