Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1916No. 3,603PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Missoula County; J. E. Patterson, Judge. Action by Margaret Johnson against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying it a new trial, defendant appeals. submitted a brief, citing in support of appellant’s contention: Spaulding v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 33 Wis. 582; Menominee River Sash & Door Co. y. Milwaukee & N. R. Co., 91 Wis. 447, 65 N. W. 176; Huber v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Missoula County; J. E. Patterson, Judge. Action by Margaret Johnson against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying it a new trial, defendant appeals. submitted a brief, citing in support of appellant’s contention: Spaulding v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 33 Wis. 582; Menominee River Sash & Door Co. y. Milwaukee & N. R. Co., 91 Wis. 447, 65 N. W. 176; Huber v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 6 Dak. 392, 43 N. W. 819; Volkman r. Chicago, St. P. etc. Ry. Co., 5 Dak. 69, 37 N. W. 731; Crary v. Chicago, M. & St.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanner

On May 10, 1913, a milch cow belonging to the respondent was struck and killed by one of the appellant’s trains, and the respondent brought this action to recover $85, the value of said cow. The complaint alleges negligence in the killing, and while the answer amounts to a general denial, negligence was the only issue developed at the trial. As evidence of such negligence, [1] respondent relied upon the presumption established by section 4309, Revised Codes. This the appellant sought to rebut by the evidence of the engineer and fireman which, if accepted in all respects, tended to show that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Emerson v. Butte Electric Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Nichols v. New York Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Lewis v. New York Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. NielsenMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API