Legal Opinion

Scott v. Nabours

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1973No. 3-173A8PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This is an automobile accident negligence case which contains one essential issue. The Plaintiff-Appellant, Harold H. Scott, alleges that he was injured in an automobile collision in Indianapolis, Indiana on June 22, 1969 as a result of the negligence of the Defendant-Appellee, James Eugene Nabours. The case was tried in the Pulaski Circuit Court resulting in a verdict for the Appellant Scott in the sum of $3000.00.

It should be noted that Appellant has not challenged the verdict as being inadequate. The Appellant asserts only a single error of law in the giving, over objection, of Appellee’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harms v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Holcomb v. NormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Robert L. Abernathy and Joyce Abernathy v. Superior Hardwoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Rieth-Riley Construction Company, Inc. v. McCarrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Daly v. NauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Barker v. ColeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API