Legal Opinion

Lisle Co. v. Phenix City Board of Education

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 19, 2012No. 1111303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

The Phenix City Board of Education (“the Board”) seeks mandamus relief from the Russell Circuit Court’s denial of the Board’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a summary judgment on claims brought against it by The Lisle Company, Inc. (“Lisle”). Because the Board is immune from suit pursuant to § 14, Ala. Const.1901, we grant the Board’s petition and issue the writ.

In October 2007, Lisle contracted with the Board to construct a facility known as “The New Central High Freshman Academy.” Controversies arose between Lisle and the Board during construction. According…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Alabama Department of Corrections v. Montgomery County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Enterprise City Bd. of Ed. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Bessemer Board of Education v. MinorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. S.K. v. Montgomery County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Baldwin County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2014
  2. Doe v. Huntsville City Schools Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  3. F.V. v. Randolph County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API