Legal Opinion

Field v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1976No. 8642PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

A grantor of real property filed this suit to recover title and possession on the theory that a provision in the deed had been violated which caused the property to revert to grantor. The trial court rendered a take-nothing judgment. Because the deed provision describes a condition subsequent and the trial court concluded, upon factual findings supported by evidence, that the three-year statute of limitation of actions for recovery of land applied, the forfeiture grantor sought by way of suit is barred. Affirmed.

By her 12 June 1949 deed reserving the minerals, Anita Field…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. City of Dallas v. EtheridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lawyers Trust Company v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Tickner v. LuseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Hudson v. CaffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Deviney v. NationsBank, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  2. Robert K. Humphrey, Individually and as of the Estate of Blanche Meyer Humphrey v. The C. G. Jung Educational Center of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Elmen Holdings v. Martin MariettaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  4. R2 Restaurants, Inc. v. Mineola Community Bank, SSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018
  5. Craig B. Singer and Carol G. Singer v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API