Legal Opinion

Tickner v. Luse

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1920No. 1066PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

This is in form an action in trespass to try title, describing three tracts of land in Eastland county by metes and bounds, and designating them as tracts 1, 2,. and 3, but having for its object more to remove cloud from title, brought by plaintiff in error, William J. Tickner, against defendant in error, J. E. Luse, and Joseph H. Beal, and the unknown heirs of Joseph H. Beal, and the unknown heirs of the unknown heirs. Plaintiff in error also pleaded the 5 and 10 year statutes of limitation. He also sought to have canceled the instrument in writing under which J. E. Luse claims to have an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. McLainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Odessa Improvement & Irrigation Co. v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dewhurst v. Gulf Marine Institute of Technology, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Hedick v. Lone Star Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Vinson Minerals, Ltd. v. XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  4. Field v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Conway v. San Miguel County Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API