Legal Opinion

Gossel v. Beazer East, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John P. Lane, J.

Defendants Lorillard Tobacco Company, Hollingsworth & Vose Company, Foseco, Inc., Hudson Plastering Corporation, Ferro Engineering Division, a division of Oglebay Norton Company, Beazer East, Inc., and Mader Plastering Corporation move and cross-move to transfer this action to the Seventh Judicial District. They base their motions on CPLR 510 (2), which provides that the court, upon motion, may change the place of trial of an action where there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be held in the proper county.

This action was commenced by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Town of Oyster Bay v. Syosset's Concern About its Neighborhood (SCAN)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Krupka v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Welch Foods, Inc. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Milazzo v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Arkwright v. SteinbuglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API