Legal Opinion

Arkwright v. Steinbugler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for a change of venue was made on the ground that there was “ good and valid reason to believe that an impartial trial could not be held in Kings County and that the ends of justice would be promoted by the change of venue. Counsel for the defendant, while disclaiming any intention to infer that any justice of the Supreme Court would be other than impartial, has nevertheless asserted that in view of plaintiff’s position and his “ close brotherly friendship with all the Justices on the Bench ”, it might be difficult for any justice presiding at the trial to maintain an absolutely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Barnes v. RooseveltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Milazzo v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Rothwax v. Spice-handlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Burstein v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. DeLuca v. CBS Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Long Island Lighting Co. v. New England Petroleum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API