Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blair

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1980No. 524PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’BRIEN, Justice.

Appellant, Joseph Blair, was found guilty of murder of the first degree, aggravated assault, and possession of an instrument of crime. The charges arose out of an incident that occurred in the house of Gorman Keehn in Philadelphia. Appellant, one of five men present in the house, fired two shots. One bullet grazed the head of Joseph Kulda; the other struck and killed Robert Cooper. Following appellant’s conviction, trial counsel filed post-verdict motions. Thereafter, new counsel for appellant filed supplemental post-verdict motions, alleging that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. WalzackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. RiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. RoundtreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. RawlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BuksaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API