Commonwealth v. Walzack
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
Today we must decide whether psychiatric evidence is admissible to be evaluated by the jury when an accused offers it to negate the element of specific intent required for a conviction of murder of the first degree thereby reducing the crime to murder of the second degree.1We *213are persuaded by the vast weight of authority that psychiatric evidence should be admissible for this purpose and, therefore, we hold that the learned court below erred in excluding the proffered testimony from the jury’s consideration.2
Prior to analyzing the specific facts of this case,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Zettlemoyer v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.