Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Rushton

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 23, 1989No. 880332-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

779 P.2d 237 (1989)

Reed MAXFIELD, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Owen A. RUSHTON and Carol Rushton, his wife, Defendants and Respondents.

Owen A. RUSHTON and Carol Rushton, his wife, Third-Party Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

STATE of Utah, By and Through UTAH STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Third-Party Defendants and Co-Respondents.

No. 880332-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

August 23, 1989.

Lorin N. Pace, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Henry S. Nygaard, Salt Lake City, for defendants and respondents.

David L. Wilkinson, Stephen G. Schwendiman, Bernard M. Tanner, Leonard E. McGee, Salt…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. Leisure Sports Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Maxfield v. FishlerUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brasher Motor and Finance Company v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API