Legal Opinion
Mark Andrew Biltz v. Google, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 20, 2018No. 5:18-cv-04094Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I MARK ANDREW BILTZ, CIVIL NO. 18-00059 DKW-KJM Plaintiff, ORDER (1) GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED vs. WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS; AND GOOGLE, INC., et al., (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. INTRODUCTION On February 14, 2018, Plaintiff Mark Andrew Biltz, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Alphabet Inc., Google Inc., Google AdWords, and Sundar Pichai, alleging breach of contract, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Dkt. No. 1. Biltz also filed an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.