Legal Opinion
State v. Vincent
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 9, 1993No. 10688PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217.1 The defendant claims that the trial court: (1) should have suppressed the revolver and ammunition seized during the execution of a search warrant because (a) there was no probable cause to believe that the items sought were present within the *251premises to be searched or that there was a nexus between such items and criminal activity, (b) the description of items authorized to be seized was overly broad and authorized a general…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. ZarickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. VincentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. SailorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.