Legal Opinion

Victor v. Turetz

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion to punish defendant Carl Turetz for contempt is granted. The receiver herein is an officer of the court within the meaning of subdivision 4 of section 505 of the Civil Practice Act; this appears to be settled by Potter v. Emerson-Steuben Corp. (251 App. Div. 841; affg., 162 Misc. 392). General Electric Co. v. Sire (88 App. Div. 498), upon which defendant so strongly relies, is clearly distinguishable; there the receiver was appointed for the benefit of judgment creditors and stood in like position as a receiver appointed in supplementary proceedings and such a receiver was held not to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. SireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Potter v. Emerson-Steuben Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Potter v. Emerson-Steuben Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StuartNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Keesing v. WishnefskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API