Legal Opinion

State v. Tester

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 8, 2006No. 03-538PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant Dwight Tester, Sr., appeals from his conviction for aggravated sexual assault following a jury trial. He asserts that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay statements of the putative victim pursuant to Vermont Rule of Evidence 804a because the statements lacked sufficient indicia of trustworthiness, and they were taken in preparation of legal proceedings. Even assuming that the hearsay statements were properly admitted, defendant argues, the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Defendant also maintains that the trial court committed reversible error by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. State v. DelisleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Kanaan v. KanaanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HollidaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Leo Paul Pratt IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. TesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API