Legal Opinion

Wood v. Master Schools, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1930No. 7 Div. 954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill was for rescission of a contract for fraud, on which plaintiff acted to her prejudice, to set aside a deed for fraud, for the recovery of moneys paid and induced thereby, and for injunction.

The status quo may be preserved by temporary injunction to final determination on showing that plaintiff has a fair question to raise as to the existence of her right, and a “showing of balance of convenience.” Rice v. Davidson, 206 Ala. 226, 89 So. 600.

The several purchases and conveyances were made on contracts under seal^ entered into and executed during September and November, 1925 ; the bill…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Edmondson v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Hafer v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Woodlawn Realty & Development Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Ingram v. People's Finance Thrift Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Eisenberg v. SteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. West v. HolmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API