Legal Opinion

Doodlesack v. Superfine Coal & Ice Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The plaintiff on April 22, 1933, entered into a written contract with one Rosenbaum wherein the plaintiff agreed to furnish the labor and material for the *425erection of a building, to be used as an ice manufacturing plant, on land of Rosenbaum. The agreement provided for the payment of a stated sum in instalments as the work progressed. The work of erection began on April 24. On April 29 Rosenbaum became acquainted with one Fistel and on May 2 they organized a corporation under the name Superfine Coal & Ice Corp. to operate the ice plant when constructed. Fistel lent the corporation $5,000,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Abbott v. DoaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Griffin v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Oldenburg & Kelley v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dangelo v. FarinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Seder v. KozlowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Greenberg v. WeismanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. American Fireworks Co. v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API