Doodlesack v. Superfine Coal & Ice Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
The plaintiff on April 22, 1933, entered into a written contract with one Rosenbaum wherein the plaintiff agreed to furnish the labor and material for the *425erection of a building, to be used as an ice manufacturing plant, on land of Rosenbaum. The agreement provided for the payment of a stated sum in instalments as the work progressed. The work of erection began on April 24. On April 29 Rosenbaum became acquainted with one Fistel and on May 2 they organized a corporation under the name Superfine Coal & Ice Corp. to operate the ice plant when constructed. Fistel lent the corporation $5,000,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Abbott v. DoaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Griffin v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Oldenburg & Kelley v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dangelo v. FarinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Seder v. KozlowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Greenberg v. WeismanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- American Fireworks Co. v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.