Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ellis v. Butterfield

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1977No. 12086Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

The majority opinion works an injustice to the appellants and is at such a variance with the prior decisions of this Court, that I must respectfully dissent. The importance of this case can not be overemphasized; the majority opinion today takes this Court a giant step backwards.

I. LAND SALE CONTRACTS.

The land sale contract continues to play an important role in financing Idaho real estate property transactions. It brings together purchasers and sellers where otherwise a transaction might not be brought to culmination. Both are benefited. It is of extreme importance to the person desiring to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Blinzler v. AndrewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  5. MacFadden v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API